Measurement of Hemodynamic Variables Under Spinal Anesthesia With Varied Positioning

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Pregnancy, Anesthesia

In brief

Multiple studies have compared spinal anesthetic performed supine versus lateral, with varying results, in parturients having elective cesarean section. Needle positioning during spinal placement has also been examined. No positioning techniques have demonstrated definitive superiority for hemodynamic stability. Investigators propose that following spinal placement in the sitting position if the patient is placed in a lateral position for 90 seconds prior to turning them supine, hemodynamic changes caused by sympathectomy related to the subarachnoid block can be avoided. This is the first study to examining the influence of position changes after spinal anesthetic placement in the sitting position, which includes hemodynamic variables not previously studied including cardiac output, TPR (total peripheral resistance) and pulse pressure variation (PPV).

Key facts

Study ID
NCT02883075
Run by
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
People needed
61
Starts
2017-08-01
Expected to finish
2018-11-26
Last updated by the study team
2019-02-28

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.