SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Stopped early · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Cystocele, Rectocele, Enterocele

In brief

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of R-SCP versus HUSLS for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02800512

Run by

Loma Linda University

People needed

116

Starts

2016-12-27

Expected to finish

2026-06-10

Last updated by the study team

2026-06-16

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 100. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• 18 Years of age or older
• Signed Informed Consent
• Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse,
• Willing and able to complete all study visit

You may not qualify if…

• Non-High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension (unable to do HUSLS at time of surgery),
• Dementia or considered unable to complete questionnaires
• Hx of Alzheimer Disease
• Hx multiple strokes or other neurologic condition
• Caregiver states the subject is unable to complete
• MDs opinion
• Inability to complete follow up visits due to transportation issues
• No access to transportation (ie. does not have vehicle)
• Live > 2 hours from LLUH
• Does not have financial means
• Congenital anomalies
• Bladder Exstrophy
• Connective tissue disease
• Neovaginal prolapse
• Prolapse of sex change vagina
• Chronic pelvic pain
• > 6 months of pelvic pain of undetermined origin
• not cyclic pain (eg. period pain or dysmenorrhea)
• Patient has comorbidities of CPP
• Fibromyalgia
• Interstitial cystitis
• Vulvodynia
• Contraindications to Mesh,
• Opposition to the use mesh (ie. due to religious beliefs)
• History of mesh complications in past

Where it is running

• Loma Linda University URO/GYN — Loma Linda, California, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.