Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

Completed

Conditions studied: Pelvic Organ Prolapse

In brief

This cross sectional, two cohort study seeks to investigate both anatomic outcome and subjective, functional outcome of uterosacral ligament suspension versus robotic sacrocolpopexy and compare patient satisfaction, bladder function, sexual function and complication rate for each procedure.This study will provide a better understanding about the durability of these procedures and long term complication.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02741830

Run by

TriHealth Inc.

People needed

186

Starts

2016-04-07

Expected to finish

2018-10-16

Last updated by the study team

2019-01-10

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Women aged 18 years of age or older who spent 3-7 years following uterosacral ligament suspension or robotic sacrocolpopexy.
• Concurrent procedures such as suburethral sling, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, hysterectomy, rectopexy.
• Concurrent procedures such a s takedown of sling

You may not qualify if…

• Concurrent procedure to remove vaginal mesh at time of their index surgery
• Unwillingness to participate in the study
• Dementia or inability to provide informed consent

Where it is running

• Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates — Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.