Comparison of Two Gingival Displacement Procedures

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Gingival Retraction Techniques

In brief

Purpose: To compare the quality of impressions made with a cordless gingival displacement procedure versus impressions made with a corded technique. The devices and materials used in both procedures are FDA-approved, marketed, and will be used according to label. Participants: Approximately sixty (60) adult patients who are treatment planned for indirect restorations (crowns) at the UNC School of Dentistry. Procedures (methods): Participants will be randomized to receive either the cordless gingival displacement procedure (Aquasil Ultra Cordless, Dentsply), or the corded technique (Ultrapak, Intradent) followed by impression with Aquasil Ultra, Dentsply. Participants will complete the Faces pain scale. Impressions will be photographed, digitally scanned, and evaluated.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT02716727
Run by
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
People needed
16
Starts
2016-10-01
Expected to finish
2019-11-01
Last updated by the study team
2020-08-18

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.