Safety and Effectiveness of a New Pleural Catheter for Symptomatic, Recurrent, MPEs Versus Approved Pleural Catheter

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Malignant Pleural Effusion

In brief

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new catheter is safe and effective in treating malignant pleural effusions compared to approve catheter.

Key facts

Study ID: NCT02649894
Run by: C. R. Bard
People needed: 119
Starts: 2016-05-01
Expected to finish: 2018-04-18
Last updated by the study team: 2025-12-11

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

1. Male or female, at least 18 years of age, inclusive. 2. Subject has a symptomatic MPE requiring intervention. For an effusion to be defined as malignant, at least one of the following must be true:
There is histocytological confirmation of pleural malignancy
The effusion is an exudate (per Light's criteria) in the context of histocytologically proven malignancy elsewhere, with no other clear cause for fluid identified.
Subject has a history of at least 1 ipsilateral pleural effusion causing dyspnea that responded to thoracentesis where the lung expanded and the dyspnea was improved.
Subject is willing and able to provide written informed consent. 5. Subject is willing and able to meet all study requirements, including follow-up visits and receiving study-related telephone calls.
Subject has sufficient pleural fluid to allow safe insertion of an IPC. 7. Subject has negative pregnancy test if appropriate. 8. Subject or caregiver is able to perform home drainage of the pleural effusion (a caregiver can be a friend, family member or paid healthcare professional and applies to US sites only; UK subjects will have drainage managed by home-care nurses).

You may not qualify if…

1. Subject has significant trapped lung, or a proximal bronchial obstruction which is likely to lead to trapped lung. For a subject to be eligible for this study, 2 separate study center clinicians must agree that there is no significant trapped lung on the same CXR using visual estimation (reference guide). The CXR used to make this decision must have been performed ≤30 days preceding the consent form being signed, and must have been performed preferably on the same day, but no more than 7 calendar days after a pleural drainage.
Significant trapped lung is deemed present if any 1 of the following criteria is met:
A CXR shows hydropneumothorax.
A CXR shows ≥20% of the affected hemithorax to be free of the expected lung parenchymal markings and there is no suggestion of pleural fluid.
A CXR shows ≥20% of the affected hemithorax to be occupied with pleural fluid AFTER a pleural aspiration which resulted in symptoms suggestive of trapped lung (e.g., chest pain or cough).
Subject has a Karnofsky score <50, or a World Health Organization (WHO)/ Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥3. Subjects who have a performance status of 3 may be considered for the study if the removal of their fluid would likely improve their performance score by 1 or more.
Subject is pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or is lactating. 4. Subject has a history of empyema. 5. Subject has a history of chylothorax. 6. Subject has an uncorrected coagulopathy. 7. Subject has a hypersensitivity to new or existing pleural catheter or it's components.
Subject has evidence, in the opinion of the Investigator, of either on-going systemic or pleural infection.
Subject has had a lobectomy or pneumonectomy on the side of the effusion. 10. Subject has undergone a previous attempt at ipsilateral pleurodesis which has failed.
Subject has previously been diagnosed with a serious immunodeficiency disorder.
Subject has bilateral pleural effusions, with both being at least moderate in size (greater than one-third of the hemithorax on CXR).
Subject has evidence of fluid loculation such that attempts at pleurodesis are likely to be futile.
Subject has a mediastinal shift of ≥2 cm toward the side of the effusion. 15. Subject is receiving concurrent intrapleural chemotherapy or radiation therapy to the ipsilateral chest.
Subject has any clinical condition, diagnosis, or social circumstance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would mean participation in the study would be contraindicated.
Subject has no access to a telephone. 18. Subject has no documented blood values (complete blood count [CBC], coagulation tests, urea and electrolytes, and liver function tests [LFTs]) within the last 10 days.
Subject has previously participated in any clinical trial with the investigational device.
Subject currently enrolled in any other clinical investigation or who has participated in any clinical investigation in the 30 days prior to starting this study.

Where it is running

Heart Center Research — Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Stanford University School of Medicine/ Stanford Cancer Institute — Stanford, California, United States
Moffitt Cancer Center — Tampa, Florida, United States
Northwestern Unversity — Chicago, Illinois, United States
St. Vincent Medical Group — Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital — Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deconess Medical Center West — Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Washington Universtiy School of Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital — St Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center — Omaha, Nebraska, United States
SUNY Upstate Hospital — Syracuse, New York, United States
UNC Hospital — Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Duke University — Durham, North Carolina, United States
Vanderbuilt University — Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center — Houston, Texas, United States
Huntsman Cancer Institute — Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Southmead Hospital — Bristol, United Kingdom
Oxford Center for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital — Oxford, United Kingdom
Great Western Hospital — Swindon, United Kingdom

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.