Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation of 3&4 Part Proximal Humerus Fractures
Stopped early · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Closed Fracture Proximal Humerus, Four Part
In brief
Will patients who suffer complex humerus fractures have better functional outcomes and less implant failure with shoulder replacement (reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, RTSA) compared to shoulder repair (open reduction and internal fixation, ORIF)?
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02597972
- Run by
- Mayo Clinic
- People needed
- 3
- Starts
- 2015-09-01
- Expected to finish
- 2018-12-17
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-01-27
Who can join
Age: 70 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
Where it is running
- Mayo Clinic in Rochester — Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.