KingVision Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy - Equivalence Trial

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Tracheal Intubation

In brief

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Ambu KingVision videolaryngoscope performs as well as direct laryngoscopy for intubating small children and infants.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02590237

Run by

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

People needed

200

Starts

2015-10-01

Expected to finish

2016-09-01

Last updated by the study team

2016-10-03

Who can join

Age: any, up to 2. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients at Lurie Children's Hospital undergoing surgery/procedure where intubation is indicated
• American Society of Anesthesiology Class I-III patients

You may not qualify if…

• Children with an expected difficult airway
• A bleeding or blood clotting disorder

Where it is running

• Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — Chicago, Illinois, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.