Comparative Performance of Dynamic Elastic Response Feet
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral
In brief
The purpose of this study was to compare the functional performance of individuals with transtibial amputation using two types of prosthetic foot designs: carbon fiber vs. fiberglass composite.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02542761
- Run by
- Mayo Clinic
- People needed
- 10
- Starts
- 2015-06-01
- Expected to finish
- 2016-05-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2018-09-20
Who can join
Age: 21 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Unilateral transtibial amputee
- Currently using a carbon fiber prosthetic (DER) foot for at least the last 6 months
- Stable stump volume over the past 6 months
- Medicare Functional Classification Level K3 or K4
You may not qualify if…
- Neuromuscular problems such as previous stroke or contralateral amputation
- Use of gait aids for ambulation
- Undergoing dialysis
- Poor prosthetic socket fit or stump problems (e.g., skin breakdown)
Where it is running
- Mayo Clinic — Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.