A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lumacaftor in Combination With Ivacaftor in Subjects With CF, Homozygous for the F508del-CFTR Mutation
Completed · Phase 3 · Has a placebo group
Conditions studied: Cystic Fibrosis
In brief
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumacaftor in combination with ivacaftor in subjects aged 6 Through 11 years with cystic fibrosis (CF), homozygous for the F508del CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02514473
- Run by
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
- People needed
- 206
- Starts
- 2015-07-01
- Expected to finish
- 2016-09-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2017-10-23
Who can join
Age: 6 and older, up to 11. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Subjects who weigh ≥15 kg without shoes a the Screening Visit
- Subjects with confirmed diagnosis of CF at the Screening Visit.
- Subjects who are homozygous for the F508del CFTR mutation
- Subjects with ppFEV1 of ≥70 percentage points adjusted for age, sex, and height
- Subjects with a screening LCI2.5 result greater than or equal to 7.5
You may not qualify if…
- History of any comorbidity reviewed at the Screening Visit that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose an additional risk in administering study drug to the subject.
- Any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities at the Screening Visit that would interfere with the study assessments or pose an undue risk for the subject
- Clinically significant abnormalities in hemoglobin, liver function, or renal function at the Screening Visit.
- An acute upper or lower respiratory infection, pulmonary exacerbation, or changes in therapy for pulmonary disease within 28 days before Day 1
- History of solid organ or hematological transplantation at the Screening Visit
Where it is running
- Study site — Los Angeles, California, United States
- Study site — Palo Alto, California, United States
- Study site — Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Study site — Wilmington, Delaware, United States
- Study site — Orlando, Florida, United States
- Study site — Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Study site — Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Study site — Iowa City, Iowa, United States
- Study site — Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Study site — Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
- Study site — Kansas City, Missouri, United States
- Study site — Omaha, Nebraska, United States
- Study site — Manchester, New Hampshire, United States
- Study site — Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
- Study site — Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
- Study site — Cleveland, Ohio, United States
- Study site — Dayton, Ohio, United States
- Study site — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Study site — Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Study site — Charleston, South Carolina, United States
- Study site — Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Study site — Colchester, Vermont, United States
- Study site — Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
- Study site — Norfolk, Virginia, United States
- Study site — Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.