Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System vs. Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT)
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Venous Leg Ulcers, Diabetic Foot Ulcers
In brief
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of two types of NPWT systems; the traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) system and the single-use negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) system.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02470806
- Run by
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.
- People needed
- 164
- Starts
- 2015-07-02
- Expected to finish
- 2017-11-14
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-04-06
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Provide informed consent
- Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex
- Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments
- Have a Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm2 and ≤ 36.0 cm2
- Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months)
- Have a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) present on any part of the plantar or dorsum surface of the foot, with a surface area ≥ 0.5 cm2 and ≤ 10.0 cm2
- Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone
- Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 52 weeks (12 months)
- Acceptable state of health and nutrition
You may not qualify if…
- Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study Ulcers which are deemed as highly exuding, per the Investigator's discretion.
- Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis at the target wound location that is not currently receiving treatment [Documented history of resolved osteomyelitis is allowed].
- Subjects with a VLU: Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy.
- Clinical evidence of target ulcer infection
- Current systemic therapy with cytotoxic drugs.
- Current therapy with chronic (> 10 days) oral corticosteroids.
- Previous treatment with NPWT device or hyperbaric oxygen within 7 days of screening.
- Malignancy in the target ulcer, or history of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers)
Where it is running
- ILD Consulting, Inc. — Carlsbad, California, United States
- Valley Foot & Ankle Specialty Providers — Fresno, California, United States
- The Sun Healthcare & Surgery Group — Martinez, California, United States
- Center for Clincial Research — San Francisco, California, United States
- Olive View - UCLA Medical Center — Sylmar, California, United States
- University of Miami — Miami, Florida, United States
- NW University Feinberg School of Medicine — Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Rosalind Franklin University of Med & Science — North Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Ochsner Health System — New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Advanced Foot & Ankle — Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
- Center for Advanced Wound Care — Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
- Acclaim Bone & Joint — Fort Worth, Texas, United States
- Futuro Clinical Trials, LLC — McAllen, Texas, United States
- Carilion Clinic — Roanoke, Virginia, United States
- The Mayer Institute — Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Centre podiatrique et soins des plaies — Boucherville, Quebec, Canada
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.