Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin for Treatment of Ureteral Stones
Stopped early · Phase 4
Conditions studied: Ureteral Calculus, Ureterolithiasis, Ureteral Stone
In brief
Ureteral calculi, commonly known as kidney stones, are a frequent cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits. These stones can get caught in the ureter (the tube connecting the kidney to the bladder) and cause symptoms including pain, nausea, and vomiting. As long as the obstructing stone meets certain conditions and the patient isn't too sick, the patient is usually sent home to try and pass the stone without surgery. This treatment is known as medical expulsive therapy (MET), and routinely involves the use of a drug called tamsulosin, which relaxes the smooth muscle of the urinary system to help the stone pass. Silodosin is a drug in the same class of tamsulosin, but which is thought to have a more selective action and a quicker onset, which would theoretically make it better for aiding in kidney stone passage. The purpose of this study is a head-to-head, blinded comparison of these two drugs to see how quickly they result in stone passage. Subjects are patients presenting to the ED with acute kidney stone shown by CT scan, and who are appropriate for MET. The main study intervention is randomization to receiving either tamsulosin or silodosin. The hypothesis is that silodosin will have decreased time to stone passage compared to tamsulosin. Subjects who qualify and consent are randomized to a two-week course of either silodosin or tamsulosin. They are also given prescriptions for standard of care medications for pain and nausea, as well as a pain diary. They receive a follow-up phone call after one week to remind them of their follow-up appointment, ask about adverse events, and determine if their stone has passed. They have a follow-up visit with study staff at the end of their two week treatment to collect their pain diary, pill count, adverse events, and to determine if their stone has passed. Study participation ends after this follow-up visit.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02369744
- Run by
- Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
- People needed
- 1
- Starts
- 2013-03-01
- Expected to finish
- 2013-10-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-06-23
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 70. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Adults age 18 to 70 years
- Non-diabetic
- Unilateral ureteral calculus 4 to 10 mm visible on CT scan within the ureter
- Serum creatinine level within normal range
- Ability to tolerate oral fluids and oral pain medication
- Ability to make informed medical decisions regarding consent
- Willingness to follow up in the ER in two weeks
You may not qualify if…
- Adults unable to consent
- Age <18
- Signs of infection including Temperature >38º C or Urinalysis with any of the following: Positive Leukocyte Esterase, Positive Nitrates, or White Blood Cell Count >5/hfp in the setting of a positive urine culture (defined as a single isolated bacterial species population of >100,000 CFU)
- Patients with chronic pain already undergoing treatment with narcotic medications
- Patients already taking an alpha adrenergic antagonist medication
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
- No working phone number
Where it is running
- Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.