King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

Stopped early · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Difficult Intubation

In brief

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized trial comparing the intubation success rate and time of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope to the Glidescope video laryngoscope in order to demonstrate the comparability of the devices.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02324465

Run by

Vanderbilt University

People needed

40

Starts

2013-04-01

Expected to finish

2017-10-01

Last updated by the study team

2019-04-23

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Adult patients scheduled for elective, ambulatory surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation

You may not qualify if…

• Patients who require rapid sequence induction and intubation or fiberoptic intubation.
• Pregnancy

Where it is running

• Vanderbilt University Medical Center — Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.