EUS-CNB Versus EUS-SINK for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) Subepithelial Tumors
Stopped early · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Esophageal Subepithelial Lesions
In brief
This is a single-blinded randomized control trial trying to compare the effectiveness of diagnosis between two techniques employed in tissue sampling for subepithelial tumors (SETs) of the gastrointestinal tract. Over 2 years, patients having SET will be randomized to either get the EUS-guided core needle biopsy (EUS-CNB) or EUS-guided single-incision with needle knife (SINK) technique. This is of grave importance because the diagnosis of the myriad types of SETs is made histologically requiring a good sample.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02282111
- Run by
- Johns Hopkins University
- People needed
- 56
- Starts
- 2014-07-01
- Expected to finish
- 2017-11-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2018-10-09
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 100. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patients referred for EUS evaluation of upper GI SETs measuring an estimated 15mm or greater in maximal diameter.
- Location of SET: esophagus, stomach, duodenum
- Age >18 years and older
- Patient consent obtained
You may not qualify if…
- Endoscopically non bulging lesion
- Upper GI SETs <15 mm in size as measured during study EUS
- Lesions not necessitating tissue acquisition: i.e. lipomas, varices
- Cystic lesion
- Patients < 18 years of age
- Uncorrectable Coagulopathy (INR >1,5, platelets <100,000)
- Patients with stigmata of portal hypertension
- Patients with post-surgical UGI anatomy (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, esophagectomy etc)
- Uncooperative patients
- Pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing, which is routine for all endoscopic procedures)
- Refusal to consent form
Where it is running
- Johns Hopkins Hospital — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.