Radiofrequency Ablation vs Laser Ablation of the Incompetent Greater Saphenous Vein

Completed · Phase 4

Conditions studied: Chronic Venous Insufficiency

In brief

The aim of this study is to perform a randomized, prospective trial comparing the two current methods of treatment for chronic venous insufficiency, in an effort to evaluate complications and outcomes for each method, and ultimately, to see if one is superior to the other.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02236338

Run by

Virginia Commonwealth University

People needed

200

Starts

2008-09-01

Expected to finish

2016-08-11

Last updated by the study team

2018-05-14

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency.
• Patients in whom endovenous thermal ablation is clinically indicate.
• Have previously undergone at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment with compression stockings (unless they have venous ulcers, recurrent phlebitis, or bleeding varices).
• Have venous disease that meets CEAP clinical class 2 through 6.
• Have symptoms secondary to Greater Saphenous Vein insufficiency defined as reverse flow in the saphenous vein >0.5 seconds after calf compression or while standing.

You may not qualify if…

• Have previously undergone surgery, EVTA, or phlebectomy in that extremity (exclusive of spider vein injections or other cosmetic surface procedures).
• Have a history of DVT.
• Have a history of hypercoaguability disorder.
• Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
• Are nonambulatory.

Where it is running

• Virginia Commonwealth University — Richmond, Virginia, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.