Nasopharyngeal Versus Nasal Cannula Oxygen Supplementation in Surgery Patients

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Oxygen Administration During Deep Sedation

In brief

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled trial comparing nasopharyngeal oxygen supplementation to traditional nasal cannula in patients undergoing oral surgery under moderate sedation.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02219464

Run by

Vanderbilt University

People needed

60

Starts

2014-08-01

Expected to finish

2016-01-01

Last updated by the study team

2017-06-01

Who can join

Age: 16 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients greater than 16 years of age
• Patients who present for oral surgery or esophagoduodenography and colonoscopy
• Patients who undergo intravenous sedation

You may not qualify if…

• Patients who require endotracheal intubation
• ASA class 4 or higher
• Existing esophageal disease such as a perforation or varices

Where it is running

• Vanderbilt University Medical Center — Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.