Randomized Trial of Y Mesh vs Dual Mesh
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Prolapse
In brief
The primary objective of the proposed study is to determine the difference in suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh versus the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Hypothesis: Suturing time when using the restorelle Y mesh will be faster than when using the restorelle dual flat mesh at the time of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02156687
- Run by
- The Cleveland Clinic
- People needed
- 59
- Starts
- 2014-04-14
- Expected to finish
- 2020-04-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-11-24
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 100. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Age ≥ 18, who are to undergo laparoscopic or robotic laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
- Other concomitant laparoscopic or prolapse and anti-incontinence procedures (e.g., laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, cystocele repair, rectocele repair or mid-urethral sling procedures) will be performed at the primary surgeon's discretion.
You may not qualify if…
- Inability to comprehend written and/or spoken English
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Medical illness precluding laparoscopy
- Need for concomitant surgeries not related to pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence
- Sacrocolpoperineopexy
Where it is running
- Cleveland Clinic — Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.