Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Fibular Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study

Status unconfirmed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Ankle Fracture, Malleolus Fracture, Medial Malleolus Fracture, Bimalleolar Fracture, Trimalleolar Fracture

In brief

Isolated surgical repair of the inside portion of the tibia may be enough to stabilize an ankle fracture in which both the tibia and the fibula are broken. This would alleviate the need for another incision, plate, and screws to repair the fibula. The purpose of this study is to help determine if surgically repairing only the tibia fracture will lead to equivalent clinical outcomes when compared with surgical repair of both bones. The hypothesis of this study is that operative stabilization of the medial malleolus fracture only, in otherwise ligamentously stable bimalleolar and/or trimalleolar fractures of the ankle, will lead to equivalent clinical outcomes and functional scores as those treated with operative stabilization of both malleoli and/or all malleoli.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT02032966
Run by
University of Tennessee
People needed
30
Starts
2011-04-01
Expected to finish
2019-12-01
Last updated by the study team
2018-11-28

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.