Group Learning Achieves Decreased Incidents of Lower Urinary Symptoms

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Urinary Incontinence, Urge

In brief

This three-site randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-administered behavioral treatment program to no treatment. Women with stress, urgency, or mixed urinary incontinence will be recruited and screened centrally, evaluated clinically at each of three study sites, and random assigned to one of two treatment arms: 1. Group behavioral treatment or 2. No treatment. Group treatment modalities have the potential to reach a larger population of older women with urinary incontinence, not only in the traditional medical settings, but also in community settings. The investigators hypothesize that group behavioral treatment will be more effective than no treatment. The investigators hypothesize that the group treatment will be cost-effective compared to no treatment.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT02001714
Run by
Ananias Diokno
People needed
463
Starts
2013-09-01
Expected to finish
2016-12-01
Last updated by the study team
2017-10-19

Who can join

Age: 55 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.