Improving Life Chances of Disadvantaged Youth: Testing Best-Practice Academic vs. Non-Academic Supports
Status unconfirmed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Youth Violence, Crime, Educational Achievement
In brief
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the most cost-effective way to improve the long-term life outcomes of disadvantaged youth, by comparing best practice academic supports to best-practice non-academic supports, and learning more about whether investing in both simultaneously has synergistic (more than additive) effects.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01927523
- Run by
- University of Chicago
- People needed
- 5344
- Starts
- 2013-08-01
- Expected to finish
- 2018-06-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2017-07-11
Who can join
Age: any. Sex: male. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Lowest-performing Chicago Public School high schools, based on dropout rate, scores on academic rating scale, and where fewer than 10% of students met state standards on the Prairie State Achievement Exam
- School administrators were enthusiastic about the program and agreed to terms and conditions of the experimental design
- Male youth within these schools who are rising 9th and 10th graders in AY (Academic Year) 2013-14 and 2014-15.
You may not qualify if…
- Youth who have missed >60% of days during AY2012-13 and AY2013-14 (through March), and so would not be expected to show up in school enough during intervention years (AY2013-15) to benefit from school-based programming
- Youth who have failed >75% of classes during AY2012-13 and AY2013-14 (through March)
- Youth who have IEP (Individualized Education Program) designations for autism, speech and language disabilities, "educable mentally handicapped", and traumatic brain injury
Where it is running
- University of Chicago — Chicago, Illinois, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.