Improving Life Chances of Disadvantaged Youth: Testing Best-Practice Academic vs. Non-Academic Supports

Status unconfirmed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Youth Violence, Crime, Educational Achievement

In brief

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the most cost-effective way to improve the long-term life outcomes of disadvantaged youth, by comparing best practice academic supports to best-practice non-academic supports, and learning more about whether investing in both simultaneously has synergistic (more than additive) effects.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT01927523
Run by
University of Chicago
People needed
5344
Starts
2013-08-01
Expected to finish
2018-06-01
Last updated by the study team
2017-07-11

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: male. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.