Testing the Anesthetic Effectiveness of Buffered Articaine Injected Next to a Lower First Molar.

Completed · Phase 4

Conditions studied: Anesthetic Effectiveness

In brief

Infiltration (injecting next to the tooth) injections are common in dentistry and a number of studies have shown that articaine anesthetic, when injected next to a lower molar, is more effective than a local anesthetic injection of lidocaine. However success rates have not been as high as hoped for. No objective study has addressed the success rate of buffering articaine in a mandibular primary buccal infiltration of the first molar. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study is to compare the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with a buffered 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine solution versus a non-buffered 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine solution as a primary infiltration in the mandibular first molar. The investigators will also record the pain of injection and postoperative pain.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT01862614
Run by
Ohio State University
People needed
80
Starts
2013-04-01
Expected to finish
2014-05-01
Last updated by the study team
2021-05-26

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 65. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.