Incentives for Participation Versus Outcomes
Withdrawn before enrolling · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Smoking
In brief
One of the most important debates in the field of disease prevention is whether financial incentives should be contingent on participation in evidence-based programs for smoking cessation or on actual outcomes, like prolonged abstinence. This study can fill a major knowledge gap in this debate, which is the lack of any population trial that compared the impacts of outcomes- and participation-based incentives in a population of smokers. This research can help policy makers and health service providers choose the incentives approach that provides the most effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and cost-savings for entire populations of smokers.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01826331
- Run by
- University of Rhode Island
- People needed
- 0
- Starts
- 2014-03-01
- Expected to finish
- 2019-05-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2025-04-17
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- smoker
Where it is running
- University of Rhode Island — Kingston, Rhode Island, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.