Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Uterovaginal Prolapse

In brief

The primary purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two transvaginal apical suspension strategies for uterovaginal prolapse: a mesh augmented hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). The primary aim is to determine whether treatment success in women who undergo the above strategies differ at time points through 3 years. A supplemental study investigates anterior vaginal wall movement resulting from descent or rotation of the vaginal apex and/or anterior vaginal elongation, in women in both of the study arms of SUPeR.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT01802281
Run by
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
People needed
183
Starts
2013-04-01
Expected to finish
2025-03-07
Last updated by the study team
2025-08-26

Who can join

Age: 21 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.