Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management

Completed · Phase 4

Conditions studied: Acute Respiratory Distress

In brief

Randomized controlled trial of intubation using the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus standard laryngoscopy. Patients who are going to be intubated using standard laryngoscopy will be randomized to have their first intubation attempt done using either standard laryngoscopy or the C-MAC video laryngoscope. Subsequent attempts will be at the discretion of the treating physician.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT01710891

Run by

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

People needed

198

Starts

2011-10-01

Expected to finish

2013-06-01

Last updated by the study team

2019-03-15

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Adult patients (age >17) requiring emergent endotracheal intubation in the Emergency Department using direct laryngoscopy

You may not qualify if…

• Physician intends to intubate with a device other than a direct laryngoscope

Where it is running

• Hennepin County Medical Center — Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.