Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Resection For Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Status unconfirmed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Rectal Adenocarcinoma

In brief

This is a study that compares two types of surgery for rectal cancer. There are two procedures that can be used during this surgery, conventional abdominal resection (APR) and extended (or extralevator) APR. The investigators are doing this research to see whether the extralevator APR increases the likelihood that the edge of the tissue that is removed will be more likely to be free from cancer cells compared with the conventional APR surgery. At this time there is no evidence that one type of procedure is better at this than the other. The objective of this research is to determine whether extralevator APR is more likely to have clean margins (free of cancer) compared to the standard APR surgery.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT01702116
Run by
Stony Brook University
People needed
34
Starts
2011-07-01
Expected to finish
2013-07-01
Last updated by the study team
2013-04-25

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.