Clinician JUdgment Versus Risk Score to Predict Stroke outComes: The JURASSIC Clinical Trial

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Cerebrovascular Disease

In brief

Background: Several risk score models are now available to assist clinicians estimate outcomes after an acute ischemic stroke. Limited information is available on the predictive value of these scores compared to real outcomes and clinical judgment. Objectives: To compare clinician judgment with the use of a validated stroke risk score (iScore) and patients' outcomes.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT01657279

Run by

Unity Health Toronto

People needed

111

Starts

2012-07-01

Expected to finish

2012-08-01

Last updated by the study team

2012-10-30

Who can join

Age: 20 and older, up to 75. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Practicing and active physicians managing patients with stroke

You may not qualify if…

• retired physicians
• physicians not exposed to care for stroke patients

Where it is running

• Duke University Medical Center — Durham, North Carolina, United States
• Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre — Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• St Michael's Hospital — Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• McGill University Health Centre — Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.