Uphold Versus Robotic Surgery for Pelvic Prolapse Repair: A Decision Analytic Approach
Completed
Conditions studied: Pelvic Organ Prolapse
In brief
Within the general objective of investigating optimal medical techniques for pelvic prolapse repair, this study proposes to: (1) test the hypothesis that the UPHOLD procedure is more cost effective than robotic surgery for pelvic prolapse repair (2)using formal decision analysis as the comparative strategy
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01611285
- Run by
- Atlantic Health System
- People needed
- 20
- Starts
- 2010-11-01
- Expected to finish
- 2011-08-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2017-06-09
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 90. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Female
- Underwent either UPHOLD procedure or Robotic Surgery for Pelvic Organ prolapse
You may not qualify if…
- Other vaginal procedure to correct prolapse
Where it is running
- Atlantic Health System Department of Urogynecology — Morristown, New Jersey, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.