Comparative Accuracy of Three Versions of Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Monitoring

Completed

Conditions studied: Blood Loss

In brief

There is no study hypothesis. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the: 1) SpHb (Radical 7 Pulse Co-Oximetry with SpHb™) RevF sensor (currently marketed), 2) the SpHb RevG sensor (a new, limited release version), and 3) the Pronto-7 sensor (currently marketed version) in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT01604668

Run by

University of California, San Francisco

People needed

10

Starts

2012-05-01

Expected to finish

2013-05-01

Last updated by the study team

2013-08-21

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• ≥ 18 years of age
• ASA Classification 1, 2 or 3
• Scheduled to undergo spine surgery

You may not qualify if…

• Pregnant of nursing
• In the investigator's judgement would not be suitable for research

Where it is running

• University of California, San Francisco Moffitt/Long Hospitals — San Francisco, California, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.