Use of Ketamine vs Methohexital for Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) on Patient Recovery and Re-orientation Time
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Post-anesthesia Recovery, Orientation
In brief
When undergoing ECT treatments, patient recovery time and re-orientation time may be shorter using ketamine for induction than using methohexital.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01567852
- Run by
- University of New Mexico
- People needed
- 20
- Starts
- 2011-08-01
- Expected to finish
- 2013-03-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2014-12-30
Who can join
Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- All patients eligible for ECT with a primary mood disorder (bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) will be eligible to participate in this study. - Patients must have decisional capacity and must be able to consent for this study.
You may not qualify if…
- patients with a primary psychotic disorder (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder); patients designated as having an American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Status of greater than 3;
- patients with a known allergic reactions to methohexital , ketamine and succinylcholine;
- patients with current or previous history of aneurysms, intracranial bleeds, or intracranial hypertension;
- patients with uncontrolled severe hypertension.
Where it is running
- University of New Mexico — Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.