Randomized Evaluation of Maxillary Antrostomy Versus Ostial Dilation Efficacy Through Long-Term Follow-Up
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Chronic Sinusitis
In brief
The objective of this study is to show that long-term symptom improvement after sinus balloon dilation is not worse than symptom improvement after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and that fewer postoperative debridements are required after balloon dilation than after FESS.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01525849
- Run by
- Entellus Medical, Inc.
- People needed
- 151
- Starts
- 2011-12-01
- Expected to finish
- 2014-05-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2017-02-24
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- 18 years or older
- maxillary sinus disease
- chronic sinusitis
You may not qualify if…
- fungal disease
- Samter's triad
- hemophilia
- prior sinus surgery
Where it is running
- Entellus Medical — Plymouth, Minnesota, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.