Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Cystocele Repair Using Polypropylene Mesh or Porcine Dermis

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse, Cystocele, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

In brief

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the success rate of cystocele repair using polypropylene mesh or porcine dermis compared to that of anterior colporrhaphy in a prospective randomized fashion. The study will be performed in a randomized, prospective, single-blinded fashion.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT01393171

Run by

Kaiser Permanente

People needed

99

Starts

2006-01-01

Expected to finish

2018-04-01

Last updated by the study team

2023-11-13

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Stage 2 or > anterior vaginal prolapse requiring surgical correction.
• >18 years old
• willing to return for follow-up visits.

You may not qualify if…

• Less than stage II or > anterior vaginal prolapse,
• decline to participate,
• pregnant or contemplating future pregnancy,
• anti-incontinence procedure other than midurethral sling (ie, Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, or needle suspension) is planned as part of their surgical procedures,
• any contra-indication to receiving mesh or porcine dermis.

Where it is running

• Kaiser Permanente — Downey, California, United States
• Kaiser Permanente — San Diego, California, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.