A Trial Of Oral Chloral Hydrate Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine For Sedated Abr Exams
Completed · Phase 4 · Has a placebo group
Conditions studied: Sedation
In brief
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral chloral hydrate to intranasal dexmedetomidine for the successful completion of a sedated ABR exam (hearing exam).
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01255904
- Run by
- Baylor College of Medicine
- People needed
- 90
- Starts
- 2011-08-01
- Expected to finish
- 2014-11-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2016-05-16
Who can join
Age: 1 and older, up to 8. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patient scheduled for ABR exam with sedation to be administered according to protocol by nurse in keeping with standard practice at the TCH Audiology clinic.
You may not qualify if…
- Patients younger than 6 months or older than 8 years
- Previously failed sedation
- Weight greater than 25 kg
- Weight less than 5 kg
- BMI above 30
- Diagnosis of ADHD
- Any patient deemed inappropriate for nurse administered sedation
- Patients with any cardiac disease
- Obstructive sleep apnea
Where it is running
- Texas Childrens Hospital — Houston, Texas, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.