A Comparison of Two Assessment Tools in Predicting Treatment Success of Cimzia in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects
Completed · Phase 4
Conditions studied: Rheumatoid Arthritis
In brief
Phase 4 study to evaluate a routine patient completed assessment (RAPID3) compared to a physician completed assessment (CDAI) to predict treatment success with subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01255761
- Run by
- UCB Pharma
- People needed
- 736
- Starts
- 2010-11-01
- Expected to finish
- 2012-12-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2018-07-31
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Subjects 18 years of age or older
- Subjects with a diagnosis of Adult-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis of at least 3 months as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria
- Subjects with active Rheumatoid Arthritis as defined by:
- 4 tender joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Baseline Visits; and
- 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Baseline Visits
- Subjects who have had an unsatisfactory response or intolerance to at least 1 traditional Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARD)
You may not qualify if…
- Subjects must not have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory Arthritis
- Subjects must not have greater than 3 Arthroplasties due to Rheumatoid Arthritis and/or Steinbrocker IV Functional Capacity
- Subjects must not have a secondary non-inflammatory type of Arthritis that would interfere with study evaluation
- Subjects must not be diagnosed with Fibromyalgia with sufficient symptoms requiring treatment
- Subjects must not have a history of Infected Joint Prosthesis
- Subjects must not have discontinued biological therapy for their Rheumatoid Arthritis due to Severe Hypersensitivity Reaction or Anaphylactic Reaction
- Subjects must not have received more than 2 anti- Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents prior to enrollment
- Subjects must not have received treatment with Abatacept and/or Rituximab or have received any experimental or approved B cell therapeutic agent
- Subjects must not have a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse
- Subjects must not have known hypersensitivity to any components of the investigational medicinal product
- Subjects must not have a history of chronic infections, recent serious or life-threatening infection within 6 months or any current sign or symptom that may indicate an infection
- Subjects must not have a history of a Blood Dyscrasias
- Subjects with known Tuberculosis (TB) Disease, high risk of acquiring TB or latent TB infection
- Subjects must not be at high risk of infection
- Subjects must not have a history of Lymphoproliferative Disorder including Lymphoma signs and symptoms suggestive of Lymphoproliferative Disease
- Subjects must not have concurrent acute or chronic Viral Hepatitis B or C
- Subjects must not have known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection
- Subject must not have concurrent Malignancy or history of Malignancy
- Subjects must not have a current or recent history of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled Renal, Hepatic, Hematological, Gastrointestinal, Endocrine, Pulmonary, Cardiac, Neurological or Cerebral Disease
- Subjects must not have Class III or IV Congestive Heart Failure
- Subjects must not have history of, or suspected Demyelinating Disease of the Central Nervous System
- Subjects must not have a history of adverse reaction to Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)
- Subjects must not have significant laboratory abnormalities which in the investigators judgment would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion
- Subjects must not have a known history or clinically active infection with Histoplasma, Coccidiodes, Paracoccidioides, Pneumocystis, Nontuberculous Mycobacteria, Blastomyces or Aspergillus
- Subject must not have a known history of or be currently diagnosed with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Where it is running
- 166 — Huntsville, Alabama, United States
- 165 — Peoria, Arizona, United States
- 216 — Tucson, Arizona, United States
- 168 — Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
- 241 — Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
- 153 — Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
- 111 — Covina, California, United States
- 208 — Escondido, California, United States
- 103 — Fullerton, California, United States
- 155 — Huntington Beach, California, United States
- 202 — La Mesa, California, United States
- 203 — Loma Linda, California, United States
- 233 — Los Angeles, California, United States
- 105 — Palm Desert, California, United States
- 229 — Roseville, California, United States
- 113 — Sacramento, California, United States
- 127 — San Diego, California, United States
- 106 — Santa Maria, California, United States
- 172 — Santa Monica, California, United States
- 212 — Upland, California, United States
- 231 — Van Nuys, California, United States
- 158 — Whittier, California, United States
- 121 — Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
- 200 — Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
- 137 — Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.