Conservative Therapy Versus Epidural Steroids for Cervical Radiculopathy
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Cervical Radiculopathy
In brief
The main objective of this study is to determine whether interventional treatment (i.e. epidural steroids), conservative therapy, or the combination, is superior for cervical radiculopathy. One hundred and sixty eight patients with radicular neck pain will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI), non-interventional management with physical therapy and medications, or a combination of the two. The first follow-up visit will be at 1-month. In patients who obtain some benefit but continue to report significant pain, either a 2nd CESI can be done, the patient's medications can be adjusted, or both in the combination group. Those patients who fail to obtain any benefit will exit the study to receive another treatment or alternative care. The second follow-up visit will be at 3-months. Similar to the 1-month follow-up, the doctor may elect to change nothing in patients who are satisfied, adjust medications, schedule the patient for another CESI, or do both in the combination group. Patients who fail to obtain any benefit can exit the study to receive alternative treatment. The final follow-up visit will be at 6 months.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01144923
- Run by
- Johns Hopkins University
- People needed
- 169
- Starts
- 2010-06-01
- Expected to finish
- 2013-11-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2014-04-24
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Cervical radicular pain based on history and physical exam (e.g. pain radiating into one or both extremities, sensory loss, muscle weakness, Spurling's test etc.)
- NRS arm pain score > 3
- MRI evidence of disc pathology consistent with symptoms
You may not qualify if…
- Untreated coagulopathy
- Previous spine surgery
- No MRI study
- Arm pain > 4 years duration
- Epidural steroid injection within past 3 years
- Radiculopathy not resulting from disc pathology (e.g. foraminal stenosis or tumor)
- Signs or symptoms or myelopathy or spinal cord compression
- Previous failed trials with gabapentin or pregabalin, and nortriptyline or amitriptyline
- Allergic reactions to gabapentin or nortriptyline
- Referrals from surgery for diagnostic injections for surgical evaluation
- Serious medical (e.g. congestive heart failure) or psychiatric (untreated depression) condition that might preclude optimal outcome
- Pregnancy
Where it is running
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center — Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.