Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous Fill to Assess Voiding Function
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Urinary Retention, Surgery
In brief
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if two different methods of performing a postoperative voiding trial are equivalent in evaluating urinary retention after gynecologic surgery. Participants: The participants in this study will be women who have undergone gynecologic surgery at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01091844
- Run by
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- People needed
- 50
- Starts
- 2009-12-01
- Expected to finish
- 2010-08-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2010-10-13
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Women undergoing surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence
You may not qualify if…
- Unwillingness to participate in the investigation.
- Inability to give informed consent.
- Known preoperative voiding dysfunction
- Plan for suprapubic catheter placement at time of surgery.
- Age less than 18
- Non-English speaking
Where it is running
- UNC-Chapel Hill — Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.