The Comparison of the Necessity of Repeat Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Studies Between Tc-99m Tetro and Tc-99m Mibi
Status unconfirmed
Conditions studied: Myocardial Ischemia
In brief
Research Questions: 1. Is there a significant difference between the causal repeat rate of myocardial perfusion studies for Tc99m tetrofosmin and Tc99m sestamibi? 2. Is there a significant difference in the causal repeat rate of myocardial perfusion studies for Tc99m tetrofosmin and Tc99m sestamibi if an independent technologist reviewer blinded to the radiopharmaceutical makes the decision to repeat the study? 3. Is there a significant difference in the quantitative diagnostic measures reported between the original and the acceptable repeated studies?
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01047150
- Run by
- Cardiac Imaging of Augusta
- People needed
- 250
- Starts
- 2010-01-01
- Expected to finish
- 2010-02-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2010-01-12
Who can join
Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patients receiving sestamibi MPI study or tetrofosmin MPI study
You may not qualify if…
- Thallium or dual isotope MPI study
Where it is running
- Cardiac Imaging of Augusta — Augusta, Georgia, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.