The Comparison of the Necessity of Repeat Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Studies Between Tc-99m Tetro and Tc-99m Mibi

Status unconfirmed

Conditions studied: Myocardial Ischemia

In brief

Research Questions: 1. Is there a significant difference between the causal repeat rate of myocardial perfusion studies for Tc99m tetrofosmin and Tc99m sestamibi? 2. Is there a significant difference in the causal repeat rate of myocardial perfusion studies for Tc99m tetrofosmin and Tc99m sestamibi if an independent technologist reviewer blinded to the radiopharmaceutical makes the decision to repeat the study? 3. Is there a significant difference in the quantitative diagnostic measures reported between the original and the acceptable repeated studies?

Key facts

Study ID
NCT01047150
Run by
Cardiac Imaging of Augusta
People needed
250
Starts
2010-01-01
Expected to finish
2010-02-01
Last updated by the study team
2010-01-12

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.