A Comparison of the Studer Pouch Versus the T-Pouch Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Bladder Cancer Patients

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Bladder Cancer

In brief

This is a prospective, randomized study of two types of continent ileal neobladder construction in patients undergoing cystectomy for primary bladder cancer. Patients will be randomly assigned to have either a T-pouch or a Studer pouch constructed at the time of their surgery. They will be followed long-term to determine the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two types of diversion. The investigators' hypothesis is that the inclusion of an antireflux mechanism in the T-pouch will result in significantly fewer episodes of symptomatic urinary tract infection, and will have a lower incidence of upper tract dilation and loss of renal function over the long term.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT01008865
Run by
University of Southern California
People needed
529
Starts
2002-01-04
Expected to finish
2018-06-14
Last updated by the study team
2019-01-25

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.