Staples Versus Suture for Cesarean Wound Closure
Stopped early · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Wound
In brief
The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to compare wound morbidity (including disruption and infection) in surgical staples versus absorbable subcuticular suture for wound closure in cesarean deliveries.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT01008449
- Run by
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- People needed
- 398
- Starts
- 2009-08-01
- Expected to finish
- 2011-02-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2014-09-03
Who can join
Age: 16 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- cesarean delivery
You may not qualify if…
- chronic use of immunosuppressive agents ( e.g.po steroids > 2 weeks)
- significant immune compromising disease (e.g. AIDS, CD4<200)
- contraindication to standard post operative pain management (acetaminophen, ibuprofen, oxycodone)
- refusal or inability to give consent
Where it is running
- UAB Hospital — Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.