A Study Comparing Two Spinal Techniques for for Cesarean Delivery Anesthesia
Withdrawn before enrolling · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Hypotension, Headache
In brief
The purpose of this study is to compare single shot versus sequential bolus spinal technique via a catheter in patients undergoing Cesarean Section. We aim to determine which technique results in less blood pressure reduction and subsequent vasopressor use. Other study endpoints include the incidence of maternal post dural puncture headaches and nausea and vomiting. In addition blood and CSF will be collected to see if biochemical mediators are related to wound hyperalgesia and healing.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00990574
- Run by
- Stanford University
- People needed
- 0
- Starts
- 2009-10-01
- Expected to finish
- 2015-04-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2015-10-08
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 45. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I, II patients
- 18-45 year of age
- Uncomplicated singleton, term pregnancy
- Scheduled for Cesarean section
You may not qualify if…
- ASA class 3 and above
- Morbid obesity (BMI>40 kg/m2)
- Postpartum tubal ligation after cesarean
- Hypersensitivity and/or prior reaction to opioids
- Ineffective spinal
- Conversion to general anesthesia
- Multiple gestation pregnancy
- Emergency C-section
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia
- History of chronic opioid use
Where it is running
- Stanford University School of Medicine — Stanford, California, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.