Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging
Status unconfirmed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Rectocele
In brief
Women with vaginal bulging who are undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at Clarian Health are eligible to enroll in this study. Two different methods of correcting rectocele at the time of sacrocolpopexy will be compared for surgical outcome, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction with intercourse and bowel function. One of the surgical methods uses an additional graft material and one surgical method does not. It is hypothesized that the method which uses an additional graft material to strengthen the patient's tissues will have a better outcome.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00988975
- Run by
- Urogynecology Associates, Indiana
- People needed
- 120
- Starts
- 2009-09-01
- Expected to finish
- 2012-12-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2009-10-02
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- women with stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
You may not qualify if…
- concomitant colo-rectal procedure
- allergy to pork
- any contraindication to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Where it is running
- Clarian North — Carmel, Indiana, United States (enrolling)
- Clarian Methodist — Indianapolis, Indiana, United States (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.