Comparison of a Metal Backed Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Stopped early · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Osteoarthritis, Knee

In brief

This study is designed to compare prospectively, in a randomized Level 1 evidence fashion, the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of a modular polished tibial (MPT) tray with a moderately cross-linked polyethylene (XLK) insert to an all-polyethylene tibial (APT) design with GVF polyethylene. Comparing these two designs will afford us information in the following areas: 1. Does a MPT/XLK design have improved wear characteristics over a nonmodular APT/GVF design? 2. Is there a clear clinical advantage to the MPT/XLK design in certain patient populations that justify its use over the APT/GVF design? Answering these questions will allow surgeons to use both designs appropriately in different demand populations. This study is designed to address the questions of whether an MPT/XLK design offers improvement in wear characteristics, Knee Society scores, KOOS, WOMAC, SF-36, or radiographic measures, over an APT design. The investigator's primary hypothesis is that there will be no difference in these outcome measures at a minimum two year follow-up. A secondary hypothesis based on the long-term follow-up of this group, up to twenty years, is that there will be no difference in implant survival.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT00979147
Run by
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
People needed
400
Starts
2007-11-01
Expected to finish
2013-11-01
Last updated by the study team
2020-09-07

Who can join

Age: 60 and older, up to 85. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.