Clinical Performance Comparison of Two Contact Lenses
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Myopia
In brief
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of two contact lenses.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00975585
- Run by
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
- People needed
- 379
- Starts
- 2009-08-01
- Expected to finish
- 2009-10-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2018-06-19
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 45. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Existing daily soft lens wearer.
- Require a distance visual correction in both eyes.
- Have a contact lens spherical distance refraction between -1.00D and -6.00D.
- Have refractive astigmatism less than or equal to 1.00D in both eyes.
- Achieve 20/30 or better corrected distance acuity.
- Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease.
You may not qualify if…
- Requires presbyopic correction.
- Requires ocular medications.
- Grade 3 or 4 ocular abnormalities.
- Grade 3 corneal staining in more than one region.
- Has had refractive surgery.
- Any other injury or ocular surgery within 8 weeks prior to study enrollment.
- Has abnormal lacrimal secretions.
- Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
- Has keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
- Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), Hybrid or Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) wear in the previous 8 weeks.
- Wears habitual contact lenses that are toric, multifocal or worn extended wear.
- Any systemic illness which would contraindicate lens wear or the medical treatment of would affect vision or successful lens wear.
- Diabetic.
- Infectious or immunosuppressive disease.
- History of chronic eye disease (e.g glaucoma or age related macular degeneration).
- Pregnancy, lactation or planning pregnancy at time of enrollment.
- Participation in any concurrent clinical trial or in another trial in the last 30 days.
Where it is running
- Study site — North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
- Study site — Campbell, California, United States
- Study site — Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
- Study site — Jacksonville, Florida, United States
- Study site — Jacksonville, Florida, United States
- Study site — Miami, Florida, United States
- Study site — Winter Park, Florida, United States
- Study site — Roswell, Georgia, United States
- Study site — Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Study site — Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
- Study site — Blue Springs, Missouri, United States
- Study site — New York, New York, United States
- Study site — Chagrin Falls, Ohio, United States
- Study site — North Olmsted, Ohio, United States
- Study site — Warren, Ohio, United States
- Study site — State College, Pennsylvania, United States
- Study site — Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
- Study site — Chamberlain, South Dakota, United States
- Study site — Hot Springs, South Dakota, United States
- Study site — Bartlett, Tennessee, United States
- Study site — Brentwood, Tennessee, United States
- Study site — Memphis, Tennessee, United States
- Study site — Tyler, Texas, United States
- Study site — Burlington, Vermont, United States
- Study site — West Allis, Wisconsin, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.