Patient-Controlled Sedation Versus Anesthesiologist-Administered Sedation
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Colonoscopy
In brief
The purpose of this study is to see whether patients controlling their own sedation during colonoscopy are less likely to need help breathing than when an anesthesiologist controls the medicine, and whether we can predict when the need for help will occur. The pump used in the study is approved for clinical use by the FDA, as are the medicines used in the pump.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00868920
- Run by
- University of Pennsylvania
- People needed
- 50
- Starts
- 2008-01-01
- Expected to finish
- 2009-03-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2017-11-30
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 90. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Undergoing elective, outpatient colonoscopy
- Age ≥ 18, <90
- Meet criteria for conscious sedation (HUP Policy 1-12-11, Appendix F), as determined by the attending gastroenterologist and confirmed by the anesthesiologist by review of history
- Able to give informed consent
You may not qualify if…
- Have a history of allergy or adverse reaction to propofol or remifentanil
- Have a condition which would pose an elevated risk for administration of propofol, including primary hyperlipoproteinemia, diabetic hyperlipemia, and pancreatitis.
- Female of child-bearing potential (under 50 without surgical sterilization)
- Unable to understand the use of Patient Contolled Sedation
Where it is running
- University of Pennsylvania — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.