Awbat Versus Biobrane in Partial Thickness Burns

Withdrawn before enrolling · Phase 2

Conditions studied: Burns

In brief

• To determine if AWBAT, used in treating partial-thickness burns, would provide better healing, pain control, control of infection, shorter length of hospital stay, lower costs, and improved scarring and long term recovery when compared to Biobrane®.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT00847496

Run by

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

People needed

0

Starts

2009-12-01

Expected to finish

2012-08-01

Last updated by the study team

2012-12-11

Who can join

Age: 0 and older, up to 18. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Partial thickness burns between 4% and 40% Total Body Surface Area(TBSA)
• Full thickness burns not to exceed 10% TBSA,
• Age as specified

You may not qualify if…

• Full thickness burns that require immediate excision and grafting
• Known allergic reaction against Biobrane
• Chemical and electrical burns

Where it is running

• Shriners Hospital for Children — Galveston, Texas, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.