Immediate Office Probing vs Deferred Facility Probing for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 6 to <10 Months Old

Completed · Phase 3

Conditions studied: Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

In brief

The purpose of this study is: To determine the cost-effectiveness of treating NLDO using immediate office probing compared with deferred probing in a facility setting. As part of the primary objective, the study will determine the proportion of eyes experiencing spontaneous resolution among subjects randomized to the deferred probing group. The secondary objectives are: 1. To determine the success proportion for eyes undergoing immediate office probing as an initial procedure. 2. To determine the success proportion for eyes undergoing deferred facility probing as an initial procedure.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT00780741
Run by
Jaeb Center for Health Research
People needed
220
Starts
2008-10-01
Expected to finish
2012-01-01
Last updated by the study team
2016-06-24

Who can join

Age: 1 and older, up to 1. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.