ThermoSmart® Versus Conventional Humidification in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
In brief
That ThermoSMart humidification will result in greater compliance (mask on time, objective and subjective sleep quality than conventional humidification.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00751335
- Run by
- Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
- People needed
- 79
- Starts
- 2006-08-01
- Expected to finish
- 2008-10-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-09-24
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Previous diagnosis of OSA permitted, but patient must be novel to CPAP and no previous surgical intervention for OSA or treatment with an oral appliance.
- AHI ≥ 15 OR AHI ≥ 5 + ESS ≥ 10 OR ESS ≥ 10 + a medical co-morbidity
- Patient willing to give informed consent and follow study protocol.
You may not qualify if…
- Wake resting SpO2 < 90%
- Patient requires BiLevel PAP or supplemental oxygen
- The patient is medically unstable (e.g. respiratory or cardiac failure)
- Patient unwilling to give informed consent or follow study protocol.
Where it is running
- Suburban Lung Associates — Chicago, Illinois, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.