Ablation vs Amiodarone for Treatment of AFib in Patients With CHF and an ICD

Completed · Phase 4

Conditions studied: Heart Failure

In brief

1. To determine if catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is superior to Amiodarone treatment for symptomatic persistent/permanent AF in ICD/CRTD patients with an impaired left ventricular function. 2. Hypothesis: AF ablation is better than Amiodarone for subjects with symptomatic persistent or permanent AF and impaired LV function in terms of recurrence of AF, quality of life, 6-minute walk distance, EF and total number of hospitalizations.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT00729911
Run by
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
People needed
203
Starts
2008-10-01
Expected to finish
2015-12-01
Last updated by the study team
2019-04-10

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.