Impact of Extensive Consultation on Career Development Grant Outcomes

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Career Development Grant Outcomes

In brief

In this study we wish is to determine whether extensive (up to 15 hours) multidisciplinary consultation in biostatistics, study design, data management, ethics, and writing provided by the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute's (CTSI) Consultation Services program, improves peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation. We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will improve peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation. We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will lead to greater numbers of funded grants when compared to the usual levels of consultation.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT00662402

Run by

University of California, San Francisco

People needed

132

Starts

2008-04-01

Expected to finish

2018-07-30

Last updated by the study team

2018-10-11

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Applying for a Career Development grant from the NIH.
• Anticipated submission date is 3 or more months in the future
• Resident, fellow, or junior faculty member at UCSF or a CTSI-affiliated institution.
• Recognized potential benefit from additional consultation
• Additional areas that could be improved as judged by the subject and the initial consultant
• Adequate time to provide consultation before submission date

Where it is running

• University of California, San Francisco — San Francisco, California, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.