Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula to Nasal CPAP in Neonates

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Respiratory Insufficiency

In brief

We hypothesize that the success rate for keeping babies extubated (without a breathing tube for assisted mechanical ventilation), defined as the proportion of infants remaining extubated for a minimum of 72 hours, will be equivalent among infants managed with nasal CPAP compared to humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC).

Key facts

Study ID
NCT00609882
Run by
University of Utah
People needed
420
Starts
2007-12-01
Expected to finish
2012-06-01
Last updated by the study team
2013-02-06

Who can join

Age: any, up to 0. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.