A Randomized Trial of Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Versus Quarterly Device Interrogations in Clinic
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Tachycardia, Ventricular, Ventricular Fibrillation
In brief
The purpose of this study is to determine if remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), compared with quarterly device interrogations in clinic, will improve patients' outcomes and satisfaction and will reduce health care costs.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00606567
- Run by
- Duke University
- People needed
- 151
- Starts
- 2006-12-01
- Expected to finish
- 2010-05-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2014-07-14
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- 18 years of age or older
- Must have an ICD with or without CRT for an approved indication
- Must be planning to have their devices followed-up at Duke
- Must have a telephone (land line)
- Willing and able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if…
- 18 years of age or younger
- No telephone with land line
- Unable to provide informed consent.
Where it is running
- Duke University Medical Center — Durham, North Carolina, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.