Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Pelvic Organ Prolapse
In brief
The purpose of this study is to conduct a trial of robotic assisted versus traditional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of patients with vaginal prolapse.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00551993
- Run by
- The Cleveland Clinic
- People needed
- 78
- Starts
- 2006-09-01
- Expected to finish
- 2011-11-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2014-02-19
Who can join
Age: 21 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Women who are 21 years of age or greater
- Status post hysterectomy with apical vaginal prolapse POPQ stages II-IV (prolapse from 1cm proximal to the hymen to all points distal) that desire laparoscopic surgical management.
You may not qualify if…
- Patients that are not candidates for general anesthesia
- Inability to consent
- History of prior sacralcolpopexy
- Suspicious adnexal masses or other factors that may indicate pelvic malignancy
- History of pelvic inflammatory disease
- Morbid obesity (body mass index greater than or equal to 40)
- History of prior or need for concomitant rectopexy with sigmoid resection.
Where it is running
- Cleveland Clinic — Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.